Building for the future
Vulnerable refugees and the ECHR
Recently politics in the UK certainly haven’t been dull or boring. The very opposite, as concerns hit the level of fury over the asylum seekers selected to be deported to Rwanda under Home Secretary Pritti Patel’s agreement with that country. Several days of furious action culminated in lawyers getting some of those on board the plane taken off. Then, literally at the eleventh hour, a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights stopped the chartered flight taking off on its 4000 mile trip. But the stay of deportation is only until the judicial review process on the arrangement next month, so deportations could still be on the cards.
And what we weren’t told about this agreement with Rwanda was that it’s actually an exchange. So an equivalent number refugees from Rwanda will make their way to the UK. So what is the purpose of the stress caused to people who have lost everything and been through nightmares to find a safer place to live?
Cue annoyance at the ECHR interference by many who did not realise that the ECHR has nothing to do with the EU and was born in 1949 out of the ruins of WWII to do everything possible to prevent inhumanity.
Although no longer a member of the EU, the UK, at present, remains a member of the Council of Europe and a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, accepting judgements from the courts. Today there have been mutterings about the UK leaving, wanting to be free to control its own borders and laws. If the UK were to leave it would be in the company of one other country – Russia after its invasion of Ukraine.
Independence in the Modern World
Whilst the UK government was busy making itself a pariah, fuelling wrath over its treatment of asylum seekers and of its determination to make sweeping changes to the Northern Ireland Protocol, the Scottish Government was laying out evidence to support the forthcoming debate on independence, with a referendum scheduled for 2023, probably the autumn.
The document Independence in the Modern World: Wealthier, Happier, Fairer: Why Not Scotland? is “the first in a series of Building a New Scotland papers designed to contribute to a full, frank and constructive debate on Scotland’s future.”
There is an acknowledgement that:
“Scotland has already come a long way since 2014. A great deal of nation building has been done in the years since the last referendum. For example, in Revenue Scotland, we now have our own tax agency, and in Social Security Scotland, our own social security agency. We also have the independent Scottish Fiscal Commission and the Scottish National Investment Bank. In other words, substantial parts of the institutional infrastructure that an independent country would need, and which did not exist in 2014, are now in place.”
So we start this independence campaign from a higher starting point than we did for the 2014 referendum. The series of papers to be published in the months ahead will set out details on key issues that people will want information on. This first paper is a scene setter as any case for change needs to start with an analysis of the ‘status quo’ before we can discuss options for the way forward.
This paper asks whether Scotland’s position in the UK has enabled us to reach our full potential, now and in the future, especially now that the UK is outside the EU. A number of countries have been selected for comparison across a range of economic and social indicators, with the performance of the UK (and therefore Scotland as part of the UK). These are Denmark, Sweden, Finland,, Norway, Iceland, Ireland, Switzerland, Austria Belgium and the Netherlands.
This comparison overwhelmingly suggests that independent countries of Scotland’s size do significantly better, outperforming the UK. The comparison suggests the status quo as part of the UK is not working for Scotland or in its best interests and poses the question on how best to fix our underperformance.
“What this – and the papers that follow – will seek to do is to demonstrate that becoming an independent country, while forging a close and constructive partnership with the rest of the UK and with our fellow Europeans, can and will help Scotland match the performance of our neighbours and fulfil our potential.”
UK out-performed by other European countries
The comparisons in this paper suggest that across a range of key economic and social measures, “the UK is out-performed by a comparator group of European countries. This strongly suggests that Scotland’s performance suffers from being tied to an increasingly outmoded economic and social model and would benefit from applying lessons from the different models discussed in this paper. The full powers of independence would extend the opportunities for applying these lessons.”
The paper states an “assessment and arguments presented by Professor Kevin O’Rourke discussing Ireland’s economic development as an independent country is of interest. Professor O’Rourke argues that “a plausible candidate” for Ireland’s economic underperformance in the period between 1954 and 1973 (when Ireland joined the then EEC) was “excessive reliance on the sluggish British economy”. Ireland’s improved economic performance after 1973, even before the creation of the Single Market, coincided with its rapidly decreasing dependence on the UK for trade. “EEC membership led to a far more diversified Irish economy, less dependent on its immediate neighbour, and healthier as a result.”
UK is interregionally unbalanced
The key UK government policy of levelling up has had little effect on regional equality. The report states:
“Professor Philip McCann a leading authority on regional economics, recently examined the issue of whether the UK displays high levels of interregional inequality in the context of 28 different indicators and 30 different OECD countries, concluding that “The result is clear. The UK is one of the most interregionally unbalanced countries in the industrialised world…and almost certainly the most interregionally unequal large high-income country”.
Scotland can do better
Independence is not a stand-alone issue. It is not divorced from performances in health, education, the economy. Independence is not an abstract issue – it is about strengthening Scotland’s economic and social performance so improving Scotland’s fiscal position. Independence is about Scotland having the powers, the finances and the abilities to enhance prosperity, earnings, opportunities and the wellbeing of everyone in Scotland, now and for generations to come.
The paper is essential reading. Many of the graphs and bar charts tell a stark story. Here are few of the graphs.
The paper questions why most of the comparator countries are able to sustain relatively high spending over the long-term? Evidence suggests that higher confidence in government is correlated with higher levels of willingness to comply with taxes and, with the exception of Belgium, all the comparator countries are more successful in this respect.
“Trust in government – percentage share of the population responding “yes” to the question “In this country do you have trust in national government?” – Switzerland 84.6%, Norway 82.9%, Finland 80.9%, Netherlands 78.1%, Denmark 71.6%, Sweden 67.1%, Austria 62.6%, Iceland 59.2%, Ireland 58.8%, UK 34.7% and Belgium 29.5%.
However “Since 1999, the Scottish Social Attitudes survey has found that, by a margin of 30 percentage points or more, adults in Scotland have been significantly more likely to say that they trust the Scottish Government to act in Scotland’s best interests ‘most of the time’ or ‘just about always’, than to say that they trust the UK Government to do so.”
Outdated business model
On the UK business model the report observes that “the UK has long pursued a different economic path to that of most countries in northern and western Europe, and the policy choices it has made have resulted in different – often radically different – outcomes”. It cites the UK’s short-term approach to ownership and corporate governance, making it much more open to foreign buyouts, low prevalence of public ownership and a particularly active market for corporate control.
The report notes that:
“the UK’s distinguishing characteristics are to a large extent the results of a deliberate set of policies pursued since the 1980s. As one commentator has put it “the growth of finance, a flexible labour market, and a smaller state imprint on the economy than most western European countries were all components of the decision to chart a course towards a mid-Atlantic position”.
Independence will not magically bring changes overnight, it will not even bring about major changes in a short time frame. Like all major changes time will be required. But independence will allow us to determine the type of country we want to live in and to have our say on how that is achieved so that everyone can benefit from those changes, with Scotland becoming a wealthier, happier and fairer country, playing our part internationally for the good of people and the planet.
PS – We haven’t forgotten Partygate.